Does the president NOT have an obligation to look into major corruption? Was there NOT a reasonable basis for him to believe there was corruption in Ukraine?
Without credentials, did Hunter Biden NOT make $millions working for corrupt Ukranian Burisma-- while dad was VP? Is there NOT a record of VP dad on tape bragging about strong-arming Ukraine into dismissing those investigating Burisma?
Was that NOT an EXPLICIT example of "quid pro joe"-- using political office for his personal gain?
Did Trump's conversation with Zelenskyy NOT occur BEFORE Biden was even a candidate? Was Trump NOT explicitly absolved from ill intent by Zelenskyy?
Was there NOT a Constitutional basis, and precedent, for stated reasons... to withhold money allocated?
Did the money allocated to Ukraine NOT, actually, go through?
Based upon money and support NOT allocated by the Obama administration, how much did the Democrats really care about Ukraine?
Regarding Russian collusion, wasn't it HILLARY who offered the fictitious Steele Dossier? Did she NOT fry tens of thousands of sensitive documents from her PRIVATE email server? Were NOT millions given to her non-profit organization from foreign states?
Were there NOT highly placed, deep state insiders who ignored protocol in advancing the Steele political fairytale (now part of a criminal investigation implicating Obama, Hillary, and the whole cast of characters)?
Did the House NOT have an unmitigated opportunity in the investigative process... and find "no collusion" in the Mueller Report?
In the present instance, did the House Dems NOT initiate their investigative process in a basement and then, even when moving it to the public arena, ONLY include their OWN witnesses, and base it upon SELECTIVE facts (excluding context) ... punctuated by Schiff passing off his own fictitious narrative as a verbatim account of the phone call?
Following the House's investigative process, involving no less than 17 select witnesses, did they NOT declare it all as sufficient basis to impeach? Is there NOT reason to establish clear definition of respective "investigative" and "trial" processes? When does it end? (Even if EVERYTHING Bolton said was demonstrated to be true, it would not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.) Does the call for more witnesses NOT admit the INSUFFICIENCY of testimony thus far, and if so, what did the House believe about the strength of their case just a few days ago... prior to the Bolton disclosure?
Did NOT virtually every leader, at some point, pronounce strongly the high standard of impeachment as something requiring bi-partisan support? Is there?
If impeachment is such a "solemn" affair, what the hell were the Democrats doing having a giddy public celebration, including passing out souvenir pens for the occasion?
Has mainstream media reported accurately?
In all these regards, and politics in general, we need NOT uncritically absolve Trump or the Republicans. As with us, they are flawed. So let's not be dismissive, but reasonable and proportionate: Elections are not about canonization. They're about seeking the greatest good possible.
Accordingly, in our binary political world, we must recognize one side has accomplished the most robust economy in 50 years, negotiating major trade agreements, record unemployment, where 98% have had wage increases.
Let's consider the more fundamental considerations (without life there can be no liberty nor pursuit of happiness): protection of human life (Roe v. Wade language, predicating personhood upon science, must be reversed: If we regard the DNA-validation of a convicted criminal, we must regard the same validation for the unborn), religious freedom, restoration of Constitutional integrity, Jerusalem named the capital of Israel...
And on the other side, we must honestly ask: How many more hours and millions of dollars must be spent in yet another baseless, failed attempt to impeach the will of the American people... to hold America hostage... to advance their seemingly solitary pursuit of fabricating (and often perpetrating) crimes to fit their predetermined outcome? (impeachment) And a philosophical system (socialism) completely incompatible with the dignity of the human person, and without the slightest historical evidence of success!
What is the Democrat's vision of America? Look no further than that icon of unconstrainted, full-blown liberalism, where free food is in abundant supply, in the form of four-legged, plague-spreading creatures... and everyone can count on free housing... a ratty, decrepit cardboard box: Los Angeles.
A clear read on the current political landscape (please allow me a little rhetorical flourish!): If we don't take the "MENTAL" out "governmental" we'll be bereft of the requisite virtue to GOVERN.
